Wednesday, June 14, 2006

MoveOn Letter

I received this email today and thought you all might find it of interest.

I just thought you might like to know how things are lining up for the next election's theft.

There are links to the MoveOn site for contributions and other information
. I am NOT asking you to contribute. That is your choice.

As part of our big plan to win the election we've been running TV ads in key districts around the country. Yesterday I got news that a TV station in Virginia has refused us the right to air our newest ad that focuses on Iraq. They won't even return our phone calls.

It smelled fishy so we looked into it. Sure enough, the Republican Party has been threatening to sue TV stations that run our ads. That's not all. Two of the senior executives at the station—including one of the guys who makes the decision about running ads—actually donated to the Republican's campaign!

We want to show that playing dirty doesn't pay. Our plan is to INCREASE the size and length of the ad buy on other stations in the district. Can you contribute $20 or more to help fight back? Click below.
Click here.

If we create a disincentive for playing dirty it can help make sure the playing field is fair across the country. We can do that when we raise $500,000 and keep the ads on TV for two weeks longer. And, we have a special new TV ad about Iraq.


The new ad uses the "Caught Red Handed" theme that has worked so well. It talks about how much money members of Congress are taking from defense contractors in Iraq at the same time our troops don't have enough body armor.


Some people say that Democrats should avoid the Iraq debate during the election. We think that's dead wrong but we need your help to show that's true.


We've tested these ads, and we know they produce a punch with voters—even among people who don't yet support leaving Iraq. (You can view the whole ad on the contribution page.)


To prove that Iraq is important to focus on during the election we hired a top political polling firm to investigate the opinions of voters in the top 68 "swing" districts—two-thirds of these districts are represented by Republicans.


Here is what we found:

  • The war is by far the most important issue to voters in these districts right now.
  • By wide margins these voters think the war was a mistake and not worth it. People are angry about the war.
  • A discussion about Iraq during the campaign increases support for the Democrat. A Democrat who takes a firm stand for getting out of Iraq does better than a Democrat who take wishy-washy position—even in the face of Republican attacks like, "cut and run."
  • Republicans are vulnerable to all sorts of attacks—including their blind support for Bush's policy of never-ending war.
  • Voters are universally angry about how defense contractors have been put ahead of our troops and how priorities here at home have been neglected.

These results are paradigm-shifting news but not surprising. Every poll out there shows anger about the war. Voters are ready to hold Republicans accountable for letting Bush get away with everything—especially Iraq.

To win in November we need to put Iraq in front of the voters. So far MoveOn is the only organization that will do that in these elections. That's why we can't leave these elections in the hands of the Democrats alone.

With your support we can do what the Democrats won't yet: make 2006 a year of accountability for Republicans on Iraq. If we can show this works then Democrats and others will follow in our footsteps—boldly speaking out about the mess in Iraq.


The best way to bring our troops home is to show consequences for politicians who want to follow Bush on Iraq. This ad plays double duty by helping bring the troops home and win the election. We can do good and do well.


Can we count you in? We're going to need thousands of MoveOn members to step forward and make this commitment.


Thanks for all you do.
–Tom, Wes, Justin, Rosalyn and the MoveOn.org Political Action Team Wednesday, June 14th, 2006

PAID FOR BY MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

7 comments:

bronxbt said...

this is why i post about puppy dogs, table drawings and other random, nonsensical and stoopid stuff...

omg that is depressing. never doubted it tho. anyone who doesn't think our government isn't corrupt on some level needs to crawl back under their rock.

this may be a little ignorant of a statement, but it's each and every one of our faults though. We vote them in, we allow them to do what they do, and in truth, we could make the appropriate gestures to get them out.

would I support that email without further investigation? no. but it's an eye opener to something that is likely happening everywhere... right now.

where's my puppy dog. i think i need a hug... I mean.. SHE needs one.

yesh.
okay then.

Jack K. said...

I have to laugh if you don't mind. I am in the middle of finalizing the post and had to go dry some dishes. I think I got the final posting up. I come back from my serve wifee chore and lo and behold there is already a comment.

Wow!

I too am overwhelmed by the audacity of it, if it is true.

I am not asking anyone to contribute. I am only asking for people to investigate on their own. It is time for thinking and doing people to step up and be counted.

Reverend X said...

Jack,
here's what we are up against. GOP Defence Contact-Campaign Financing Recursive Loop
`And no one investigates a thing...

sparringK9 said...

/bark bark bark

the TV stations are gun shy due to the fact that other moveon ads in the "red handed series" take some half way right info and go too far.....you can review it at factcheck.org if you care to.

http://www.factcheck.org/article383.html

i hate american politics.

/grrrrrrr

/grrrrrrrrrr

Karen said...

Thanks for reminding me of my email from MoveOn.

Bird said...

i'm on the mailing list for factcheck.org. it's run by the annenberg (annenburg?) institute. i like 'em. they seem to be relatively unbiased - they call both dems and repubs on the carpet. provide thorough analysis of the ads in question. support their analysis with documentation. pretty solid stuff.

Jack K. said...

Thanks to k9 and bird. More about that in the subsequent posting.